
 |
ROBERT E. ROHDE
Direct: (206) 386-7356
brohde@rvk-law.com
Select a
link to learn more about Robert E. Rohde:
|
Practice/Experience
-
Mr. Rohde has
practiced law since 1982. He is the former chair of the
Intellectual Property Practice Group of Bogle & Gates PLLC.
-
Mr. Rohde’s
practice focuses on complex commercial litigation with an
emphasis on intellectual property litigation (patents, trade
secrets, trademarks and copyrights). He has tried many
cases, both jury and non-jury, in federal and state courts.
Mr. Rohde has also handled numerous alternative dispute
resolution cases.
-
Mr. Rohde is an accomplished
appellate lawyer. He has argued numerous times before the
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals and the Washington Court of Appeals. Mr. Rohde has
prevailed on six of his last nine appeals.
-
Mr. Rohde has been recognized
by his peers as a Washington State Super Lawyer in
Washington Law and Politics each year since 2002.
Patent Cases
Database Software Cases
Timeline v. ProClarity –
Representation of Timeline in a patent infringement and
breach of contract case against Microsoft. Case settled
favorably for Timeline.
Microsoft v. Timeline –
Representation of Timeline in a multimillion-dollar
licensing dispute with Microsoft. Prevailed on appeal. Case
reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of
Timeline.
Timeline v. Hyperion
Solutions, Inc.– Representation of Timeline
asserting database software patent. The case was favorably
settled.
Timeline v. Sagent –
Representation of Timeline, Inc., in a patent suit
concerning software for database management. Obtained a
substantial settlement on behalf of patentee, which included
cash and stock equal to 2% of the defendant's outstanding
shares.
Timeline v. Oracle –
Enforcement of a database software patent against Oracle
Corporation. Obtained a substantial favorable settlement on
behalf of the patentee.
Internet Commerce Cases
CRS, LLC v. Gametap; CRS, LLC v. Napster, LLC;
CRS, LLC v. Valve Corporation – Representation of CRS
in cases involving patents covering commercial systems for
downloading digital content over the internet. Favorable
settlements for CRS.
Communications Network
Cases
TeraBeam v. Dominion Communications – Obtained
Summary Judgment of non-infringement in a patent
infringement case involving high-speed laser communications.
The patentee sought $100 million in damages and injunctive
relief.
Electronics Cases
-
Carver v. Carver – Lead
counsel for Carver Corp. in a patent and licensing dispute
involving audio electronics. Obtained favorable settlement.
-
Checkmate Systems, Inc., v.
Applied Microsystems, Inc. – Patent and trade secrets
cases involving microprocessor emulators. Obtained dismissal
of trade secrets case and settlement of patent case.
-
Forte Technologies Corp., v.
Virtual I-O, Inc. – Representation of Virtual I-O in a
patent case involving a head tracking system for virtual
reality headsets. Defeated motion for preliminary injunction
and purchased and revived abandoned patent application which
forced plaintiff to settle case on extremely favorable terms
Other
-
Lamb Weston –
Representation of Lamb Weston in a number of patent and
trade secret cases.
-
Sonus Pharmaceuticals v.
Molecular BioSytems, Inc – Representation of Sonus
defending counterclaims in a biotech patent case. Obtained
Summary Judgment dismissing defendant's counterclaims.
-
CMB v. Watts –
Representation of CMB, a subsidiary of United Dominion, in a
patent suit involving backflow prevention devices. Obtained
consent decree in which accused infringer removed products
from market and paid substantial settlement.
Trademark Cases
Power Industries v. Edmark
– Representation of Edmark in a trademark dispute
regarding the mark Imagination Express. Obtained settlement
favorable to Edmark
Bell Helicopter Textron
– Representation of Bell Helicopter as lead counsel for a
national trademark enforcement program.
Warner Bros., D.C. Comics
– Representation of Warner Bros. and D.C. Comics as part
of a nationwide program to enforce trademarks and copyrights
in conjunction with the movie Batman.
Foote v. Magic Software
– Representation of Foote in a trademark dispute regarding
the mark Magic Software. Obtained settlement favorable to
plaintiff.
Fluke v. Greenlee Textron
– Defense of Greenlee, a subsidiary of Textron, in trade
dress litigation. Obtained favorable settlement.
Copyright Cases
-
Wade Cook v. Anthony Robbins
– Representation of Wade Cook in a copyright
infringement case against the nationally known motivational
speaker. Obtained plaintiff's verdict, which was upheld on
appeal.
-
Norman v. KCTS –
Representation of KCTS in dispute concerning rights to a
high definition television program featuring Jessye Norman.
Obtained dismissal on behalf of KCTS.
-
Warner Bros., D.C. Comics
– Representation of Warner Bros. and D.C. Comics as
part of a nationwide program to enforce trademarks and
copyrights in conjunction with the movie Batman.
-
O’Conner v. Universal
Studios – Representation of Universal Studios in
a Lanham Act and copyright infringement action involving the
hit television series Northern Exposure. Obtained
favorable settlement.
Other Cases
-
Saros Corporation v. Frame
Technology Corporation – Representation of Frame
Technology in a software-licensing dispute. Engineered quick
and favorable settlement.
-
US Tel v. Sprint –
Defense of Sprint in a telecommunications rate dispute.
Obtained favorable judgment after trial for Sprint.
-
Van Ackeren v. KCTS –
Defense of KCTS in a copyright and misrepresentation action
involving the underwriting and production of KCTS’s highly
successful “Over Washington” videotape. Obtained defense
verdict.
-
Software Architects, Inc. v.
Elektroson B.V.I – Representation of the successor in
interest to Elektroson in arbitration over the rights to DVD
premastering software. Adverse award in favor of Software
Architects.
Professional
Memberships
- Washington State Bar Association
Intellectual Property Section
Conference
Participation
Mr. Rohde is a frequent speaker on litigation issues. He
has most recently given lectures concerning trademark
counterfeiting, the admissibility of expert testimony after
Daubert, the deposition of expert witnesses and the
determination of reasonableness for statutory awards of
attorney’s fees.
Educational Background
- J.D., Cornell Law School, 1982
Editor
of the Cornell Law Review, 1981-1982
Member
of the Cornell Law Review, 1980-1981
- B.A., Indiana University, 1979
- Admitted to the Bar in Washington State in 1982;
admitted to practice before the Federal Circuit and Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. District Courts for
the Western and Eastern Districts of Washington; specially
admitted to practice before Alaska, Colorado, Oregon, Idaho,
Maine, Massachusetts and Texas courts in a number of cases.
|